Showing posts with label freedom of the press. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freedom of the press. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Julian Assange is Free!

 


© WikiLeaks
Source: RT

Assange leaves UK prison to finalize plea deal with US

The Australian-born activist is expected to strike a deal with the US Department of Justice, court documents say

WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange was released from captivity in Britain on Tuesday morning, his team has said. The publisher spent five years in Belmarsh Prison in London while fighting extradition to the US, where he was indicted on 18 counts of disseminating classified information.

According to newly filed court documents, Assange will soon strike a plea deal in order to avoid further time behind bars.

“Julian Assange is free. He left Belmarsh maximum security prison on the morning of 24 June, after having spent 1901 days there,” WikiLeaks wrote on X (formerly Twitter). “He was granted bail by the High Court in London and was released at Stansted airport during the afternoon, where he boarded a plane and departed the UK.”

WikiLeaks said the international campaign to free Assange has created “the space for a long period of negotiations with the US Department of Justice, leading to a deal that has not yet been formally finalized.”

“As he returns to Australia, we thank all who stood by us, fought for us, and remained utterly committed in the fight for his freedom,” WikiLeaks wrote.

According to a letter from the DOJ, Assange will appear in court in Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands, a US territory in the Pacific, at 9am local time on Wednesday. “We anticipate that the defendant will plead guilty to the charge… of conspiring to unlawfully obtain and disseminate classified information relating to the national defense of the United States,” the letter said.

The DOJ said it expects Assange to return to his home country of Australia after the proceedings.

Under Assange’s leadership, WikiLeaks published multiple top-secret files, including documents related to the US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as a trove of US diplomatic cables. In 2010, the organization published a video of a US military helicopter attacking civilians in Baghdad in 2007 after mistaking them for insurgents.

Fearing extradition to the US, Assange spent seven years in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. He was ejected from the premises in 2019, when, under a new president, Ecuador revoked his asylum status. The activist was immediately arrested by British police and subsequently spent five years in Belmarsh, much of it in solitary confinement, after being found guilty of jumping bail.

Assange’s legal team, family, and associates have described the conditions in Belmarsh as “torture” and warned that his health significantly deteriorated behind bars.

In 2012, the WikiLeaks co-founder hosted ‘The World Tomorrow’ on RT. Over 12 episodes, the program covered a number of hotly debated topics, featuring guests such as Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, former Guantanamo Bay inmate Moazzam Begg, and former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan.
------------------------------------------------------

Assange freed as part of plea deal


A Julian Assange supporter protests in front of Westminster Magistrates Court, while calling for his release from Belmarsh Prison, on April 14, 2024 in London, England. © Peter Nicholls/Getty Images

Source: RT

The WikiLeaks co-founder is expected to finalize his release at a court in the Northern Mariana Islands, a US territory in the Pacific

WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange has been freed from Belmarsh maximum security prison in the UK as part of a plea deal with the US Justice Department. The activist spent five years behind bars in London while fighting extradition to the US, where he is accused of illegally obtaining and disclosing national security materials which shed light on alleged American war crimes.

According to the US Department of Justice, Assange has agreed to plead guilty at a court in the Northern Mariana Islands, a US territory in the Pacific. He is expected to be sentenced to around five years, equating to the time he has already spent in the British prison, while the extradition request is likely to be dropped. After the court proceedings, Assange is expected to travel to Australia, his country of citizenship.


26 June 2024

00:23 GMT

Assange told the judge that he had believed that the First Amendment to the US Constitution protected him during the publication of classified material.

”I accept it’s a violation of the espionage statute,” he continued. “I believe the First Amendment and the Espionage Act are in contradiction with each other, but I accept that it would be difficult to win such a case given all the circumstances.”

Assange described himself as “a journalist” who “encouraged my source to provide information that was said to be classified.”

00:17 GMT

As part of his plea agreement, Assange is required to instruct WikiLeaks to destroy classified information stored on its servers or devices, the court has heard. US prosecutors told Judge Manglona that they are satisfied that Assange has done so. It is unclear whether WikiLeaks has complied or will comply with this instruction.

25 June 2024

23:49 GMT

Assange has pleaded guilty to a single count of conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defense information. Asked whether he was ready to enter a plea, Assange replied “yes.” Asked whether he was pleading guilty or not guilty, he responded “guilty.”

23:32 GMT

According to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Judge Romana Manglona has entered the courtroom and Assange’s hearing has begun.

Sitting beside the WikiLeaks founder are Australian Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd, Australian Ambassador to the UK Stephen Smith, and Assange’s lawyer Jennifer Robinson.

22:19 GMT

Stella Assange has shared a video of her husband arriving at the courthouse in Saipan. “I watch this and think how overloaded his senses must be, walking through the press scrum after years of sensory deprivation and the four walls of his high security Belmarsh prison cell,” she wrote on X.

21:47 GMT

Assange has arrived at the United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands in Saipan. The former WikiLeaks head showed up at the courthouse ahead of schedule and is expected to plead guilty to a single espionage charge, as per the deal struck with the US government.

Assange did not respond to questions from the press as he passed through a metal detector and entered the building.

21:38 GMT

Former Pink Floyd frontman Roger Waters has congratulated Assange on his release, calling on the WikiLeaks founder to return to journalism once he is in good health.

“You know what I’d like to see? You old mucker, I’d like to see you back at work at WikiLeaks. Somebody has to pick up the cudgels and keep up the amazing, brilliant work that you did,” he said in a video posted by Double Down News.

“Good on you Julian! Thank you for the huge sacrifice you made for the rest of us,” Waters concluded.

Waters has campaigned for Assange’s release for more than a decade, visiting the Australian publisher in London’s Belmarsh Prison last October. “It was emotionally very crippling,” Waters said of the visit. “Imagine being locked up in solitary confinement for five years, particularly if you’ve never committed a crime. It’s beyond all imagination.”

20:24 GMT

Assange will leave Saipan for Australia at 12pm local time on Wednesday (2am GMT), according to a flight plan filed with authorities in the US territory and posted on the tracking site FlightAware. This timeline suggests that Assange’s legal team expects his court hearing – scheduled for 9am local time – to be wrapped up quickly.

20:10 GMT

Julian Assange’s charter jet has entered US airspace and will touch down in Saipan in a matter of minutes, Wikileaks has announced on social media. VistaJet flight VJT199, which left London on Monday and made a refueling stop in Bangkok on Tuesday, is the world’s most-tracked airplane, according to the Flightradar24 app.

17:22 GMT

The Free Assange Campaign has raised more than $115,000 toward the $520,000 cost of Assange’s charter flight to Saipan, according to Crowdfunder. The WikiLeaks founder was not permitted to fly commercial to the US territory, and will have to reimburse the Australian government for the cost of the flight.

Assange took off for Saipan after a refueling stop in Bangkok on Tuesday night, and will touch down in Saipan just after 6am local time (8pm GMT), according to data from Flightradar24.

16:59 GMT

The chief executive of the Committee to Protect Journalists, Jodie Ginsberg, hailed the news of Assange’s release, saying the WikiLeaks co-founder faced a prosecution that had “grave implications for journalists and press freedom worldwide.”

“While we welcome the end of his detention, the US’ pursuit of Assange has set a harmful legal precedent by opening the way for journalists to be tried under the Espionage Act if they receive classified material from whistleblowers,” Ginsberg reportedly claimed, stressing “this should never have been the case.”

16:36 GMT

“Millions of people who have been advocating for Julian, it is almost time for them to have a drink and a celebration,” Assange’s brother Gabriel Shipton told Reuters.

Shipton earlier revealed to Australia’s ABC that he knew for weeks his brother was about to be released from prison in the UK.

Speaking about the footage of Assange boarding the plane at Stansted Airport, Shipton said it was “great” to see his brother in broad daylight again. He added that the last time they saw each other was in the visitors room at Belmarsh Prison in the UK.

15:51 GMT

A plane with Assange on board departed Bangkok, Thailand after refueling on Tuesday, the Associated Press reports. The chartered flight from London left Don Mueang International Airport, according to the Flightradar24 plane tracking app. The WikiLeaks co-founder is reportedly on the way to Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands, a US commonwealth in the Western Pacific, to enter a plea deal with the US government.

14:54 GMT

The International Federation of Journalists has welcomed Assange’s release as a “significant victory for media freedom” and “a massive boost for free speech.” It added that the development “avoids the criminalization of the normal journalistic practices of encouraging sources to confidentially share evidence of wrongdoing and criminality.”

14:23 GMT

Assange’s release is a “welcome surprise” but is “long overdue,” American political commentator Jackson Hinkle has told RT. He said that the WikiLeaks co-founder had been “tortured in prison not for committing crimes of his own but for exposing crimes” of powerful Western leaders.

Hinkle suggested that the US had avoided the inevitable outrage which would have followed if Assange had been extradited and jailed in America. The journalist also did not rule out that the move to free Assange may have been a bid to boost US President Joe Biden’s ratings.

“Objectively, this is one of the best things any president has done in my entire life. You have to give credit where credit is due,” Hinkle said. He added, however, that the fact that Assange will have to plead guilty is “horrific” and sets a “terrible precedent.”

13:58 GMT

Several other world leaders have reacted to Assange’s release, including Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who said: “The Statue of Liberty did not remain an empty symbol; she is alive and happy like millions in the world.”

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro also congratulated Assange, describing his release as “the triumph of freedom and humanity’s fight for respect for Human Rights.”

“Assange is an example of courage and bravery in the battle for the truth. Justice will always prevail!” he added.

13:39 GMT

Former US Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who held the post between 2010 and 2017, when Assange released many of his bombshell reports, said the WikiLeaks co-founder had “paid his dues,” given that he spent several years in the Ecuadorian embassy and then in prison.

He told CNN that he was more or less happy with the imminent deal. "Critical to this was his plea on one count of espionage. I think the law enforcement community and the intelligence community wouldn’t have bought into this without that.”

13:24 GMT

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has reacted cautiously to the news of Assange’s release, saying it is necessary to know the exact conditions of the Wikileaks co-founder's imminent plea deal with the US in order to make any conclusions.

12:56 GMT

The plea agreement between Assange and the US was signed last Wednesday, according to the order released by the UK High Court, which granted conditional bail to the activist based on this deal. The court also noted that it is “anticipated that a plea will be entered and accepted on Wednesday 26 June 2024, after which the United States have undertaken to withdraw the extradition request.”

12:20 GMT

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told parliament that Assange is being accompanied by the high commissioner to the UK, Stephen Smith, Australia’s most senior diplomat in Britain.

“The Australian government has continued to provide consular assistance to Mr. Assange,” he said, adding that Canberra’s envoy to the US, Kevin Rudd, is “also providing important assistance.”

Albanese added that regardless of what the general public thinks about Assange and his activities, “the case has dragged on for too long.” “There is nothing to be gained by his continued incarceration and we want him brought home to Australia.”

11:48 GMT

Stella Assange has said her husband will seek a pardon, which can only be granted by the US president, once he has pleaded guilty as part of his deal with the US Justice Department. The prosecution of the activist under the Espionage Act is a “very serious concern” for journalists, she added.

11:26 GMT

The administration of US President Joe Biden had to agree to release Assange in exchange for a guilty plea partly because it came under pressure from the Australian government, former Biden aide Tara Reade has claimed.

In an interview with RT, she said the White House did not want to extradite the Australian-born activist and have a “spectacle” in the run-up to November’s presidential election, as Assange enjoys widespread popular support. Reade said, however, that the US was still reluctant to “take responsibility” for its actions, as it would not drop the charges against Assange or former NSA operative Edward Snowden, who leaked classified data.

10:52 GMT

Former UN Special Commission weapons inspector and ex-US Marine Corps intelligence officer Scott Ritter told RT that while he is happy to see Assange’s release, the outcome of the case against the activist is an “absolute defeat for free speech in America,” explaining that he had to admit to a crime he had not committed.

“The US government won. They broke him,” Ritter stated, adding that no American is immune to the same kind of persecution.

10:34 GMT

Stella Assange told the BBC that one of her priorities now is to get the activist “healthy again,” as “he’s been in a terrible state for five years” while being held in Belmarsh maximum security prison. She added that Assange’s children, who are five and seven years old, for now don’t know about the imminent plea deal, because it is yet to be set in stone.

10:14 GMT

Stella Assange has confirmed that her husband’s plane – which she said cost $500,000 to book – has landed in Bangkok and “will soon take off again and fly into US airspace where he will appear before a US judge.” The aircraft is scheduled to land in Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands, at 6am local time (8pm GMT), according to the Flightradar website.

09:24 GMT

Speaking to the BBC, Stella Assange has said her husband and the US Justice Department have reached “an agreement in principle,” which has to be formally signed by the judge in the Northern Mariana Islands.

09:01 GMT

Former US Vice President Mike Pence, who served in the Trump administration, has blasted the plea agreement, claiming that Assange “endangered the lives of our troops in a time of war and should have been prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

Pence hit out at the Biden administration, accusing it of “a miscarriage of justice” and of dishonoring US service members and their families.

08:38 GMT

US presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr has welcomed the freeing of Assange. However, he deplored that the activist had to agree to a guilty plea.

This “means the US security state succeeded in criminalizing journalism and extending their jurisdiction globally to non-citizens,” the presidential hopeful wrote on X (formerly Twitter). He added that, if Assange had persisted, “he would have died in prison” due to his heart problems.

08:02 GMT

Assange was forced to agree to a guilty plea as for years he wrestled with “the system designed to beat you down,” human rights activist Marty Gottesfeld has told RT. Gottesfeld spent years in a US prison after being accused of launching a cyberattack at a Boston hospital, to expose what he insists was the medical kidnapping and “torture” of a girl.

Gottesfeld suggested that the US is unlikely to bar Assange from talking about the harsh prison conditions he had endured, noting that this would be “unprecedented.” At the same time, he did not rule out a gag order prohibiting the activist from further discussing the contents of classified American files.

08:01 GMT

Former Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa, who granted Assange asylum at the country’s embassy in London in 2012, has told RT that the activist has been “persecuted for telling the truth, not for lying.” “This has been really crazy. Twelve years of a journalist’s life have been stolen from him for telling the truth. The real war criminals went unpunished,” Correa said.

07:46 GMT

Stella Assange, the Australian-born activist’s wife, posted a photo on X (formerly known as Twitter) of what she said was “Julian calling into Sydney from Stansted airport last night” with the Sydney Opera House in the background.

07:18 GMT

Murray said that while Assange will have to live within certain limitations, his family apparently believes that the deal is certain. “Of course, nobody really takes seriously this guilty [plea]. It’s obvious… this is coerced. It is a cheap move by the Biden administration, to claim a little hollow victory for themselves.”

06:54 GMT

Despite his release and expected deal with the US Justice Department, Assange is a “marked man” and “will always be in danger” after exposing US secrets, Craig Murray, a human rights activist and former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, told RT. This threat, he added, comes “particularly from the malicious forces of the CIA and the United States.”

06:35 GMT

The VJT199 charter flight believed to be carrying Assange has landed in Bangkok, Thailand, according to the Flightradar24 website. It is unclear whether the aircraft is refueling after flying from the UK, or how the activist will continue his journey to the Northern Mariana Islands, some 5,000km to the east.




Friday, January 2, 2015

World News from Alternative Sources

Daily News Updates in Video Format

Russia Today (Live)



World News 2015



World War III Updates



Syria – News 2015



Yemen – News & Information (2011 to 2015)



Palestine – News 2015



Important Information 2.0


America – The Police State & Global Terrorist



Global Economic News 2015



Debate – Global Issues



Ukraine – Fascist Coup & Civil War 2015



Abby Martin – Empire Files



Viewpoint, Discussion & Opinion



Max Igan - Surviving the Matrix


Ken O’Keefe – The Straight Truth


Iran – News & Information



Turkey – News & Information



Egypt – News & Information



Libya – News & Information



Bahrain – News & Information



George Galloway – Comment & Opinion


Sheik Imran Hosein – Islamic Eschatology



DON’T FORGET: Japan's 3 Nuclear Melt Downs


English FA Cup Football Highlights 2015 – 2016


Important Documentaries



More Important Information



Space News



New Age Weather Report


Music for the Revolutionary Mind




Global Revolution


Watch live streaming video from globalrevolution at livestream.com

English FA Cup 2014 – 2015 (Full Season)



English FA CUP Great Moments Archive



Thursday, August 22, 2013

Bradley Manning headed to prison, those who authorized torture go free


Former secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld shares a laugh with former president George W. Bush and former vice president Dick Cheney during his farewell parade at the Pentagon.

By: Matt Sledge, The Huffington Post
Source: Press TV

Bradley Manning was sentenced to 35 years in prison on Wednesday for releasing 700,000 documents about the United States' worldwide diplomacy and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Manning was a 25-year-old Army private first class at the time of his arrest. He saw himself as an idealist acting to end the wars, and said in online chats with hacker Adrian Lamo that he was particularly concerned about the abuse of detainees in Iraq. No political or military higher-ups have ever been prosecuted for detainee abuse or torture in Iraq, Afghanistan or at Guantanamo Bay.

"One of the serious problems with Manning's case is that it sets a chilling precedent, that people who leak information ... can be prosecuted this aggressively as a deterrent to that conduct," said Andrea Prasow, senior counterterrorism counsel and advocate in Human Rights Watch's U.S. Program. "Shouldn't we be deterring people who commit torture?"

Here are some of the individuals who have been involved since 9/11 in detainee abuse and torture, and potential war crimes, and have never been prosecuted.

George W. Bush

George W. Bush was president when the U.S. invaded Iraq based on faulty intelligence, tortured terror prisoners and conducted extraordinary renditions around the world.

"Enhanced interrogation," a Bush administration euphemism for torture, was approved at the highest level. A "principals committee" composed of Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin Powell, CIA Director George Tenet and Attorney General John Ashcroft signed off on the methods.

"There are solid grounds to investigate Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Tenet for authorizing torture and war crimes," said Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, when the group released a report called "Getting Away With Torture" in 2011.

Dick Cheney

As Bush's vice president, Cheney pushed the nation over to the "dark side," as he called it, in the war on terror.

The U.S. used extraordinary renditions to swoop up terror suspects and send them to repressive regimes for torture. Cheney was the key driver in producing the faulty intelligence that led the U.S. into war in Iraq. And he steadfastly defended the CIA's use of water-boarding and other torture tactics on U.S. prisoners.

Cheney "fears being tried as a war criminal," according to Colin Powell's former chief of staff Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, but he never has been.

Donald Rumsfeld

One of the planners of the Iraq War, Rumsfeld steadfastly maintained while Defense Secretary under Bush that U.S. soldiers did not have an obligation to stop torture being used by their Iraqi counterparts. He also approved of "stripping prisoners naked, hooding them, exposing prisoners to extremes of heat and cold, and slamming them up against walls" at Guantanamo.

While deployed to Iraq, Manning discovered that Iraqi soldiers had arrested members of a political group for producing a pamphlet called "Where Did the Money Go?" decrying corruption in the cabinet of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

"‘I immediately took that information and *ran* to the officer to explain what was going on," Manning wrote in the chat logs. "He didn’t want to hear any of it … he told me to shut up and explain how we could assist the FPs in finding *MORE* detainees."

George Tenet and CIA torturers

Tenet was the CIA chief who told Bush that the case for war with Iraq was a "slam dunk." Under his watch, the CIA waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri.

Further down the chain of command at the spy agency, lower-level officers have escaped prosecution for killing a prisoner in Iraq and one in Afghanistan in CIA custody. Attorney General Eric Holder in 2012 ruled out prosecuting anyone responsible for those deaths.

In sharp contrast, former CIA agent John Kiriakou is currently serving a 30-month sentence for revealing to reporters the names of interrogators involved in detainee abuse.

Abu Ghraib higher-ups

Although low-level soldiers like former Army Reserve Specialist Lynndie England were court-martialed for their role in detainee abuse at this notorious prison in Iraq, graphically illustrated in photos, the only officer prosecuted in the case had his conviction tossed out.

A 2009 Senate Armed Services Committee report found that the abuses at Abu Ghraib were not the result of a few unmonitored bad apples but rather the direct result of "enhanced interrogation" practices approved of by officials much higher up in the Bush administration.
-----------------------
Update: 11:55 am

Bradley Manning In His Own Words After Being Sentenced to 35 Years

Video Source: The Real News
Manning's attorney David Coombs reads American Hero Bradley Manning's statement after he is imprisoned for 35 years in a Military Prison.

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Bradley Manning sentenced to 35 years in prison


US Army Private First Class Bradley Manning arrives alongside military officials at a US military court facility to hear his sentence in his trial at Fort Meade, Maryland on August 21, 2013. (AFP Photo / Saul Loeb)

Source: Russia Today

A US military judge has sentenced Army Pfc. Bradley Manning to 35 years in prison. Manning faced up to 90 years behind bars, while prosecutors sought to put the whistleblower away for a minimum of six decades.

Manning will be credited with the 1,294 days he spent in pre-trial confinement plus an additional 112 days. He was also dishonorably discharged, saw his rank reduced to private from private first class and was forced to forfeit all pay and benefits. No additional fine, however, was levied against him. Manning will have to serve a third of his sentence before he is eligible for parole.

Col. Denise Lind, who on Tuesday began her deliberations in the court-martial case, announced the sentence shortly after 10am local time (14:00 GMT). Lind read out the sentence succinctly and provided no other statement as a gaggle of journalist’s waited in anticipation. Flanked by his lawyers, Manning, 25, stood at attention and appeared not to react when Lind announced the punishment, AP reports. He further made no statement after his fate was announced

Immediately after sentencing, Amnesty International called on President Barack Obama to commute Manning’s sentence to time already served to allow his immediate release.

"Instead of fighting tooth and nail to lock him up for decades, the US government should turn its attention to investigating and delivering justice for the serious human rights abuses committed by its officials in the name of countering terror,” said Widney Brown, Senior Director of International Law and Policy at Amnesty International.

The American Civil Liberties Union was also quick to excoriate the decision.

“When a soldier who shared information with the press and public is punished far more harshly than others who tortured prisoners and killed civilians, something is seriously wrong with our justice system,” said Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy and Technology Project.

Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, decried the sentence as "unprecedented" in its magnitude.

"It's more than 17 times the next longest sentence ever served" for providing secret material to the media, said Goitein. "It is in line with sentences for paid espionage for the enemy."

Manning's lawyer David E. Coombs had asked the judge for leniency, requesting a sentence that did not “rob him of his youth." Coombs argued that Manning's leaks had not endangered the US.

The prosecution had sought a 60-year sentence, arguing the stiff term would deter others from leaking classified information.

"There's value in deterrence," prosecutor Capt. Joe Morrow said in his closing argument on Monday

 
Protesters with the Bradley Manning Support Network hold a vigil while waiting to hear Manning's sentence on August 21, 2013 outside the gate of Fort George G. Meade, Maryland. (AFP Photo / T.J. Kirkpatrick)

Last week the 25-year-old Manning apologized for the “unintended consequences” of his actions, saying he believed he was “going to help people, not hurt people."

He told the court at Fort Meade, Maryland, that "the last three years have been a learning experience for me."

WikiLeaks responded to Manning’s mea culpa, saying “the only currency this military court will take is Bradley Manning’s humiliation.” The anti-secrecy group continued that Manning’s “forced” apology was done in the hopes of “shaving a decade or more off his sentence.”

The soldier was convicted last month of 20 charges including espionage, theft and violating computer regulations. Manning was found not guilty, however, of the most serious charge – aiding the enemy – which entailed a potential sentence of life without the possibility of parole.

Manning faced up to 90 years in prison for passing on more than 700,000 Iraq and Afghanistan battlefield reports and State Department diplomatic cables to WikiLeaks while working as an intelligence analyst in Iraq in 2010. He was later arrested in Iraq in May of that year.

He also leaked video of ‘Collateral Murder’ video, which shows a US helicopter attack in Baghdad in which at least nine non-combatants were killed, including a Reuters news photographer and his driver.

Manning is entitled to appeal against any verdict handed to him by the court-martial in the Army Court of Criminal Appeal within six months
.

Collateral Murder Bradley Manning Leaked Video Clip


Video Source: Sunshine Press

Manning's sentence unjustifiably harsh, crimes he exposed remain unpunished – Moscow

Source: Russia Today

Moscow has slammed the “harsh” sentence for US Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, saying it was apparently meant to scare away other whistleblowers, and was not in accordance with human rights standards.

“When the USA’s interests are at stake, the American judicial system, as in the case of Bradley Manning, takes unjustifiably harsh decisions based on the principle of 'let’s teach them so that it doesn’t become a habit' – and without any glance at the human rights aspects,” Russian Foreign Ministry’s special representative for human rights, Konstantin Dolgov told reporters on Wednesday.
Calling Manning’s case an example of US “double standards in regard with the supremacy of law and human rights,” Dolgov argued it showed that America’s claims for leadership in those respects are “groundless.”

The Foreign Ministry official then cited international human rights groups – including those in based in the US – who believe Manning has revealed “widespread abuses on the part of the US Army during operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, including the deaths of civilian, the torture of prisoners, as well as the other grave abuses of the international human rights law. ”

Despite all the efforts of rights groups and the UN Human Rights Council, no one in the US was held accountable for these crimes, Dolgov added
----------------------------------------------------

FREE Bradley Manning!!! Jail the top brass of the US Military for their War Crimes in Iraq AND the US Government executive for their Aggressive war on the sovereign nation of Iraq!

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Assange loses extradition court battle 14 days to apply to reopen case




Source: Russia Today

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has lost his marathon court battle in UK Supreme Court. The judge has granted him 14 days to make an application to reopen the extradition case.

Assange was not present in court to hear the ruling.

The judge ruled that the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) issued against Assange for his extradition to Sweden was legal under the Vienna Convention.

Assange’s legal team asked for a 14-day extension to reopen the case on the basis that they thought the ruling would be made under the UK legal system and were not adequately prepared.

Under UK law an EAW can only be issued by a judge and therefore Assange’s lawyers had argued the extradition order against him was invalid as it was made by a Swedish prosecutor.

The judges ruled that under the Vienna Convention the prosecutor was a “judicial authority.”

As a result the whistleblower may be sent to Sweden, where he has been accused of sexual assault and rape by two former WikiLeaks volunteers.

Assange says the allegations are baseless and are founded on political motivations after his website released thousands of diplomatic cables and documents sparking outcry from world governments.

There are fears that Assange will eventually be transferred to the US, where he would join Private Bradley Manning, who is currently facing court-martial for handing over classified documents to the whistleblower’s website

Monday, January 23, 2012

'Zionist Bicom behind UK Press TV ban'


Source: Press TV
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/222562.html

The Zionist Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre (Bicom) has collaborated with the state-controlled British Office of Communications (Ofcom) to ban the alternative English-language channel Press TV in the UK, a political analyst says.

“With anti-Iran sabotage activities high on its agenda, Bicom has worked closely with Ofcom towards eliminating a critical voice: Press TV,” Ismail Salami, Iranian author and Middle East expert, wrote in an article published on Press TV on Sunday.

Ofcom revoked Press TV's license and removed the channel from the Sky platform on January 20 for what it claimed to be the news network's breach of the Communications Act. The British media regulator also served Press TV's London office with an order to pay a 100,000-pound fine.

“An office with intimate ties to the [British] Royal Family, Ofcom has issued the verdict under the sway of some influential parties in the government and the Bicom firm to boot,” Salami added.

He went on to explain the activities and objectives of the Israeli-sponsored company, pointing out that as a “London-based” organization “tasked with inseminating the Zionist political ideology, Bicom also funds those who are in one way or another involved with anti-Iran activities.”

“Apart from garnering support for the Zionist regime among Britons, the office also serves as a bridge between the Mossad and MI6,” with its current head, Lorna Fitzsimons, a member of the parliamentary lobby group Labor Friends of Israel (LFI), Salami elucidated.

The Iranian author also pointed to the October 2011 scandal over Adam Werritty -- an “influential member” of Bicom and “an unofficial chief of staff” to the former British Defense Minister Liam Fox -- and his efforts to subvert the Islamic Republic of Iran.

“Werritty was financially backed by murky sources such as Bicom. And he was considered an influential member of the organization and a highly regarded agent for Mossad,” he noted.

“Reports also suggest that Werritty had regularly met Iranian anti-government groups, Israeli agents and right-wing US groups with a long-standing interest in subverting [Iranian] President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and overthrowing the Islamic government,” Salami elaborated.

The Middle East expert noted that, “With the closure of Press TV's office in London and the removal of the channel from the Sky platform, Britain is now deluded into believing that her efforts have resulted in splendid fruits and that she has been able to gratify the whims of the Zionists.”

“Alas! Poor Ms. Britain! There is never an impediment to the free flow of truth!” Salami concluded.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

PressTV ban says West democracy fake


Source: Press TV
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/222336.html

Senior Iranian lawmaker Alaeddin Boroujerdi says revoking Press TV's UK broadcasting license runs counter to Western claims of democracy and freedom of speech.

“Press TV has carried out its duty, but they [British officials] took a political and preferential approach [towards the news channel],” said the head of the Majlis (parliament) National Security and Foreign Policy Committee.

The Iranian lawmaker condemned the British Office of Communications (Ofcom) for its blatant violation of freedom of speech by revoking Press TV's license for what it calls breaching the broadcasting code.

Earlier, Ofcom also hit Press TV with a fine of 100 thousand pounds. The British media regulator stepped up pressure on Press TV after the news channel covered British police crackdowns on anti-austerity protesters in London and other cities in the country.

Ofcom is said to have close ties with Britain's royal family. The cables released by the whistleblower website WikiLeaks show that Press TV's programs on the royal wedding, which many in the country describe as extravagant, has angered the royal family.

Boroujerdi added that visual media is obligated to cover significant events and developments and hence nothing can justify UK's unacceptable decision to take Press TV off air.

He concluded that such approaches prove that the West pretends dictatorships are democracies.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

British Government's appalling decision


Source: Press TV
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/218303.html

We see another draconian decision being made here in London to silence yet another TV channel that has always attempted to tell the truth.

Britain's Office of Communications (Ofcom) has moved a step closer to total censorship of the British Media when it decided to remove the Iranian English-language news channel from the Sky platform.

This decision is yet another nail in the coffin of democracy that David Cameron boasts so much about........what democracy?

Press TV has since its inception broadcast a very balanced view on a multitude of international topics. It has in my opinion been the very foundation of free speech and has always attempted to bring guest speaking onboard from both sides of the argument.

I guess the saying “The truth hurts” has at long last struck at the heart of the British Government with some stories that Press TV has been able to uncover.

What I find rather ironic is the fact that the BBC has now also fallen victim to Government censorship and my question would have to be “what is now left to watch that has not been doctored by the Government or our secret services”?

For many years I was always proud of my country and as a dedicated citizen served in the armed forces but I now have to say in my retirement that the image of my country has now been badly tarnished.

We have now become a country that focuses on far away wars, created mass hysteria about the possibility of some untrue Islamic attack, started systematic rape of Middle Eastern natural resources such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. We are now looking at conflict with Syria, Somalia, Yemen and Sudan with the ultimate target being that of Iran.

We are a country that is ravaged by out of control massive fraud and corruption that involves senior executives of many companies, banks, financial institutions and extremely senior politicians, including our own pass and current Prime Ministers.

We are sending our troops off to faraway lands to fight for no just cause and at the same time using weapons of mass destruction that are killing many thousands (if not millions) of innocent civilians and contaminating our own troops with severe medical consequences.

Press TV is but one of a few that has flown the flag of “free speech & democracy” that we the British have been so proud to promote and yet we have now allowed our current government to remove this unbiased channel from our shores.

It was the words of Press TV's CEO, Dr. Mohammad Sarafraz that hit the nail on the head in his response to Ofcom:

This letter is written in response to your government-controlled organization's decision to ban Press TV's broadcast in a desperate effort to silence an alternative voice in the UK.

Your decision to remove Press TV from the Sky platform was made after confidential documents from the US Embassy in London about Washington and London's concerted effort to block Press TV in Britain were leaked.

I could not have said it better myself but unfortunately we are not likely to see a change of heart by David Cameron or the British Government....they have a beautiful explanation when it comes to such matters...........as they would say “It is not in the interest of the British public.”.....my response would be to such a pathetic response “Why don't you ask the British public what they want to watch”......I guess we already know the reply and our request would fall on deaf ears......now that's true democracy for you!!!!

I myself have played a major part in actively becoming involved with Press TV both in Tehran and in London and found their topics extremely balanced and interesting..........I believe they always attempted to show both signs of the coin and frequently found myself up against some hard line Zionist or some US Congressmen that always kept the debate very much alive.

I found the closing comment by CEO Mohammad Sarafraz very inspirational when he said the following:

“What the British government fails to grasp is that the truth cannot be concealed forever, and those in the UK that want to hear Press TV's alternative voice will inevitably find a way to watch the channel of their choice. History will be unforgiving of such futile efforts to suppress free speech.”

From my perspective one can only hope that the Press TV “Flagship” continues to sail on with its gallant Captain (Mohammad Safarfaz) at the helm and that the crew of this wonderful channel of “Truth” continue to expose those that wish to deceive us...........Press TV reminds me of some very meaningful sayings by Ghandi which in my opinion fit perfectly with their ethos:

“There are times when you have to obey a call which is the highest of all, i.e., the voice of conscience even though such obedience may cost many a bitter tear, and even more, separation from friends, from family, from the state to which you may belong, from all that you have held as dear as life itself. For this obedience is the law of our being”

“When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall -- think of it, ALWAYS.”

Jefferson once said: "If there be one principle more deeply rooted than any other in the mind of every American, it is that we should have nothing to do with conquest." "Conquest is not in our principles; it is inconsistent with our government." Another very famous American William Jennings Bryan made the following comments during one of his many public speeches:

In 1859 Lincoln said that the Republican Party believed in the man and the dollar, but that in case of conflict it believed in the man before the dollar. This is the proper relation which should exist between the two. Man, the handiwork of God, comes first; money, the handiwork of man, is of inferior importance. Man is the master, money the servant.” Jefferson said “Equal rights to all and special privileges to none.” Lincoln added “This should be a government of the people, by the people and for the people”

How things have changed since those early days and many famous people have now destroyed the very principal of good ethics and morality.......the top of the list would have to be such people as Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Paul Bremer, John Bolton, Condoleezza Rice and Paul Wolfowitz, George Bush Snr and Jnr, Obama, Blair, Brown and now our dear David Cameron. They have extended their own “Geo Political Master Plan” by progressively raping the world of its resources. They all state that Globalisation is good and that they all want to “Make Poverty History”..........for my part it is totally the opposite........”Globalisation has increased poverty” and only serves one purpose, to break down trade tariffs allowing the west to destroy their markets.

One has to fully understand that Western Imperialism breeds Self Induced Conflicts and Terrorism and the two together create Massive Poverty.
Lincoln stated “The safety of this Nation was not in its fleets, its armies, or its forts, but in the spirit which prizes liberty as the heritage of all men, in all lands, everywhere.”

Finally Bryan puts everything into perspective “It is not necessary to own people in order to trade with them. We carry on trade today with every part of the world, and our commerce has expanded more rapidly than the commerce of any European empire. We do not own Japan or China, but we trade with their people. We have not absorbed the republics of Central and South America, but we trade with them. It has not been necessary to have any political connection with Canada or the nations of Europe in order to trade with them. Trade cannot be permanently profitable unless it is voluntary. When trade is secured by force, the cost of securing it and retaining it must be taken out of the profits and the profits are never large enough to cover the expense. Such a system would never be defended but for the fact that the expense is borne by all the people, while the profits are enjoyed by a few.”

“Imperialism would be profitable to the army contractors; it would be profitable to the ship owners, who would carry live soldiers to the Philippines and bring dead soldiers back; it would be profitable to those who would seize upon the franchises, and it would be profitable to the officials whose salaries would be fixed here and paid over there; but to the farmer, to the labouring man and to the vast majority of those engaged in other occupations it would bring expenditure without return and risk without reward.”

As we enter into a New Year one would have to ask the question will this bring in WW3........the west certainly has every intention of starting one and Iran clearly appears to be the prime target........however I would ask of you all “When has Iran ever attacked anyone” who helped in promoting the war between Iraq and Iran in the 1980´s, yes folks you have it right,the main offenders were the US and the UK who deliberately gave Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction and who both wanted Iraq to win the war. Both these nations intentionally elongated the war to their own advantage. That my friends certainly reveals the “True Axis of Evil.”

Whatever the New Year brings us we must all remember that those that are suppressed or who live in absolute poverty will always survive as they have the spirit to live on....the final comments from Ghandi says it all:

“You can chain me, you can torture me, you can even destroy this body, but you will never imprison my mind”.

My own thank go to the good ship “Press TV” and may God Bless all who sail in her........”Bon Voyage”

Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant- 29/12/2011


DISCLAIMER: The authors' views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Press TV News Network.

Saturday, July 9, 2011

EU rejects restrictions on Press TV Ltd.


Britain's National Westminster (NatWest) Bank has frozen assets belonging to independent television production company Press TV Ltd.

Source: Press TV
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/188070.html

The European External Action Service (EEAS) has rejected Britain's restrictive measures against independent television production company Press TV Ltd.

Responding to a letter written to the European Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton about restrictions imposed on the company, the EEAS confirmed on Wednesday that the London-based Press TV Ltd. “is not targeted by the UN Security Council's sanctions against Iran.”

However, the EU department, which functions as the EU's foreign ministry and is under Ashton's authority, said it could not “influence the decisions of EU private operators taken in view of such restrictive measure.”

The long-awaited letter advised Press TV Ltd. to convey its complaint to the European Court of Human Rights.

In its letter of December 7, 2010, the National Westminster (NatWest) Bank announced its closure of Press TV Ltd.'s bank accounts, stating that NatWest has refused to explain the reasons behind the move.

NatWest, which is part of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, blocked GBP 200,000 of Press TV Ltd.'s income, while legal advisors argue that banks cannot freeze the accounts of media that has been operating under the regulations of the host country.

Press TV condemned the illegal step taken by the UK government, arguing that it has not received a court order classifying Press TV Ltd's programs as being in violation of British rules.

The Royal Bank of Scotland Group is a British state-owned banking company in which the UK Treasury holds an 84-percent controlling share.

Britain's government plunged into controversy when a recent Wikileaks cable revealed that London was trying to find ways to silence Press TV Ltd. as a production company.

Press TV Ltd. was incorporated to produce news, factual programs and documentaries to be sold to the Tehran-based Press TV News Network. The company produces programs that report on current affairs around the world, some of which are critical of UK and Israeli politics.

"We entered into a commercial agreement with NatWest, not a political one," said the London-based firm, adding that it was appalled by NatWest's decision.

"However, when we witness the violent attacks on our Satellite Van, our vehicles, our cameramen and our equipment, the recent demonetisations campaign by the BBC and ITN of Ken Livingstone, and the threats to our presenters, such as George Galloway in the Houses of Parliament, and the death threats to our colleagues, the detention and imprisonment of our British reporter and the theft of our equipment by Israel in international waters, with the British government not showing any reaction to any of the above incidents, it is reasonable for us to question their position, particularly following the Wikileaks cable in The Guardian about Her Majesty's government's alleged intentions to close down Press TV Ltd.”

Saturday, June 11, 2011

UK mobilizes offshoots to kill Press TV



Source: Press TV
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/184061.html

The British government has mobilized all its communications and media facilities in a desperate attempt to force Iran's English language news channel Press TV off-air.

The facilities in question include the pro-Zionist newspaper The Sunday Times and other right-wing media outlets. Also contributing to the attempt is the Office of Communications (Ofcom), the so-called media regulatory body whose managers are directly installed by the Queen and have to report to the monarchy.

Ofcom has been instructed to mount pressure on Press TV with the help of Zionist media giant Rupert Murdoch's newspaper, The Sunday Times. The paper recently published a politically motivated article to distort facts about Press TV and put more pressure on the Iranian news channel.

Press TV Ltd. is a British production company which is making programs critical of Western imperialism. Its partner in Tehran, sheds light on the dark, undemocratic aspects of the British political structure, especially the hereditary rule of the royals. It also lays bare London's double standards toward Middle East developments and their links with Britain's historical presence in the region.

Press TV's regular coverage of crimes committed by the Israeli regime in the occupied Palestinian territories are definitely among the strict red lines that British media policy-makers will not easily tolerate.

Outgoing Israeli ambassador to the UK, Ron Prosor, once wrote in The Daily Telegraph that “Britain is increasingly becoming a hotbed of anti-Israeli sentiment. Attitudes once considered marginal or extreme have drifted dangerously close to the mainstream.”

The WikiLeaks website also published cables of the US State Department, in which the British Foreign Office had told the US embassy in London, back in February 2010, that it was "exploring ways to limit the operations of… Press TV."

Therefore, the previously secretive campaign to halt Press TV's work is finally out in the open.

The disputed article published in The Sunday Times was written by Dipesh Gadher, 36, who considered himself a judge.

Before providing any facts, Gadher described Press TV as the “domestic enemy,” accusing the news channel of broadcasting unfair images of Britain.

Gadher, who became the deputy news editor at the paper in 2008, also accused Press TV of adopting non-professional news-writing regulations.

While, Gadher has ignored the definite rules of free and fair journalism, he stopped short of giving the readership any documented facts for his claims against Press TV.

Presenting fake statistics and distorting the documented facts on Press TV are visible all through his politically motivated article.

The administrative documents could easily dismiss Gadher's claims that Press TV's British presenter George Galloway is paid 25,000 pounds a month and that Press TV Ltd. -- a firm which makes programs for the Iranian channel -- had £2.7 million in savings.

Gadher claimed that Press TV's programs are politically motivated and risk the reputation of the British government, whereas many critics believe Press TV's coverage of the events, including the crackdown of student protests in London in early 2011, is balanced, unbiased and based on the facts on the ground.

The article also criticized Press TV over a public opinion poll about the royal wedding. The results of the poll revealed that 65 percent of people felt the royal wedding was an unnecessary official expense imposed on UK tax-payers.

Gadher has ignored the fact that by criticizing the poll, it has criticized those Press TV readers who participated in the survey, simply for expressing their opinions.

All this comes as British authorities have failed in their efforts to point to any problems with the quality or content of programs broadcast by Press TV.

The WikiLeaks report clearly shows that the British government has no other way but to seriously disrupt press TV's activities in Britain.

In line with this scenario, the London-based National Westminster Bank, Commercial Banking office froze the business accounts for Press TV Ltd. in April without any prior notice, claiming the accounts would be permanently closed in February 2011.

Reports also indicate that the staff at Press TV Ltd. have been intimidated and threatened by members of the anti-Iranian Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO) terrorist group in London.

The British government has, however, does not seem to have taken any measures to stop the intimidation, and threats continue on the part of the MKO forces.

Press TV's website has carried out a survey, based on which a majority of almost 6600 respondents believe the UK government is bent on silencing the news network for its reports exposing London's misguiding policies.

According to the survey, 77.82 percent of the participants believed that the primary objective behind the Britain's intensifying pressure on the Iranian news network is to silence the broadcaster because it sheds light on the dark side of British policies.

A total of 15.16 percent of the survey respondents also said the UK is attempting to discredit the channel in the eyes of international public opinion.

The remaining 7.2 percent participants said the UK seeks to remove Press TV from Sky platform or impose a punitive fine on the channel.

Britain has long been playing a destructive role in Iran, an example of which is the true extent of its involvement in the 1953 coup that toppled the country's democratically elected government of Mohammad Mosaddeq and replaced it with the tyranny of Pahlavi regime.

The state-funded British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) played a central role in that coup as evidenced by the documents.

In 2008, BBC launched a Persian channel, BBC Persian Television, which is critical of the Islamic Republic's establishment and its policies. Yet, the British government cannot tolerate a tiny but heavyweight English news channel airing from Tehran.

Friday, June 10, 2011

UK hell bent on silencing PressTV: Poll



Source: Press TV
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/183952.html

A new survey highlights a predominant view that the UK is bent on silencing Iran's English language Press TV news network due to its reports exposing London's misguided policies.

According to the survey of 6605 people conducted by Press TV, 77.82 percent of participants stated that the primary objective behind the UK government's intensifying pressure on the Iranian news network was to silence the broadcaster because it sheds light on the dark side of British policies within and outside its borders.

A total of 15.16 percent of the survey respondents expressed the belief that the UK was attempting to discredit the channel in international public opinion.

The remaining 7.2 percent participants said the UK sought to remove the channel from Sky platform or impose a punitive fine on Press TV.

The government has launched a smear campaign against Iran's Press TV following the extensive coverage the new network provided regarding a number of major issues gripping the European power, including the unprecedented student protests over tuition hikes that were met with a brutal police crackdown on protesters as well as the march by hundreds of thousands against UK government's public spending cuts.

Recent documents released by Wikileaks appear to confirm the notion that UK officials have been discussing measures to restrict Press TV's UK operations.

In April, the National Westminster Bank, Commercial Banking office froze Press TV Ltd's business account without any prior notice, claiming the accounts would be permanently closed in February 2011.

Meanwhile, in an article published on January 16, 2011, British journalist and broadcaster Lauren Booth charted UK's efforts to assist the US in blocking the company that sells documentaries and series to the Iranian news network with an identical name.

Booth, who is former British Premier Tony Blair's sister-in-law, reiterated that the Israeli-backed pressure began when the company started its activities four years ago, as part of an effort to "use Ofcom as some kind of offshoot Hasbara body."

Press TV has also been singled out for its challenging and critical coverage of the British royal family and their flagrant disregard for the common UK citizen amid the Europe-wide economic crisis.

In the latest efforts by the UK to bring further pressure on Press TV, the London-based Office of Communications (OFCOM) came up with a ruling that the Iranian broadcaster's airing of a 10-second extract from an interview with Iran-born, Western journalist Maziar Bahari while he was being held in an Iranian jail breached the regulator's rules.

On July 1, 2009, Press TV reported on an armed attack on a Basij military base in the Iranian capital, Tehran.

The story included a ten-second clip of an interview conducted with Bahari, in which he said, “On Monday, June 15 [2009], I sent a report about the attack against the base, a military base of Basij to Channel 4 News as well as to Newsweek Magazine.”

Major state-sponsored British media outlets such as the British Broadcasting Corporations (BBC) and Channel 4 aired the manipulated footage that showed what appeared to be an incident of unrest near Tehran's Azadi Square, during which a number of Basij forces were shown shooting at what was claimed by the British media to be 'peaceful protesters,' although it was evidently not clear who and what the targets were.

Press TV later aired a more detailed version of the same event that clearly showed images of rioters attacking a Basij military base with stones and petrol bombs, while the guards were making great efforts to defuse the situation and prevent assailants from accessing the base's arms cache, which contained hundreds of weapons.

The longer footage clearly showed that the previous reporting by the state-run BBC and Channel 4 had been biased and distorted as they deliberately failed to show attacks by rioters on the military base which prompted the guards at the military base to react.

OFCOM was formed under Britain's Communications Act of 2003 that brought five different British media regulators together.

A quick look at senior decision makers at OFCOM demonstrates that the regulator is mostly made up of former Channel 4 and BBC executives, some of whom are well-linked to and influenced by powerful pro-Zionist politicians.

Colette Bowe, the 63-year old OFCOM chairperson, is reportedly paid £200,000 a year to coordinate the body's different committees. Bowe enjoyed the exclusive support of Peter Mandelson, the main economic planner of the Labour party who is a Jewish politician with an obvious Zionist mindset.

Millie Banerjee, who was reappointed to the Board of OFCOM in October 2007 after serving for a five-year term, held a non-executive post in Channel 4 between 2000 and 2002.

Tim Gardam, who was appointed to the OFCOM board on January 1, 2008, is a broadcasting sector veteran with a 25-year career that began at the BBC.

Gardam is currently a member of Content Board and chair of OFCOM's Nations committee, a member of the DTT Allocation Committee and a member of the Nominations and Remuneration Committee.

Although OFCOM officially lacks the authority to examine the content and accuracy of state-funded BBC programs, the official British broadcaster is entitled to introduce candidates for positions at the regulatory body.

OFCOM oversees the technical aspects of BBC programs but not their content.

Meanwhile, the staff at Press TV Ltd have been intimidated and threatened by members of the terrorist Mujahedin-Khalq Organization (MKO) in London. Yet, the British government has turned a blind eye to such incidents and may have even facilitated their efforts as MKO elements in Britain continue their intimidating acts.

Secrets of the Emerald Tablet (Book Trailer)

The Shard of Asclepius (Book Trailer)

ICJ delivers ruling in favour of South Africa

South Africa's Closing Argument Against Israel for Genocide at the ICJ